What a winning combination?
[483] What a winning combination? - The computer chose a secret code (sequence of 4 digits from 1 to 6). Your goal is to find that code. Black circles indicate the number of hits on the right spot. White circles indicate the number of hits on the wrong spot. - #brainteasers #mastermind - Correct Answers: 63 - The first user who solved this task is Sanja Šabović
BRAIN TEASERS
enter your answer and press button OK

What a winning combination?

The computer chose a secret code (sequence of 4 digits from 1 to 6). Your goal is to find that code. Black circles indicate the number of hits on the right spot. White circles indicate the number of hits on the wrong spot.
Correct answers: 63
The first user who solved this task is Sanja Šabović.
#brainteasers #mastermind
Register with your Google Account and start collecting points.
Check your ranking on list.

A guy was driving in a car wit...

A guy was driving in a car with a blonde. He told her to stick her head out the window and see if the blinker worked. She stuck her head out and said, "Yes, No, Yes, No, Yes..."
Jokes of the day - Daily updated jokes. New jokes every day.
Follow Brain Teasers on social networks

Brain Teasers

puzzles, riddles, mathematical problems, mastermind, cinemania...

Charles Darwin write-in votes

In 2012, Charles Darwin received 4,000 write-in votes from voters in Athens-Clarke County, Georgia, protesting the re-election of an anti-science fundamentalist, Paul Broun. The Republican, a medical doctor, ran unopposed in the general election as a U.S. Representative. He sat on the Science, Space and Technology Committee. Yet, on 27 Sep 2012, Broun had expressed his contempt for the true meaning of science research when he called evolution and the Big Bang Theory, “lies straight from the pit of hell,” in a speech to a sportsman's banquet at a Baptist church. Although the votes for Darwin could not count officially, a University of Georgia plant biology professor, Jim Leebens-Mack promoted the write-in campaign to protest the incongruity of an anti-science fundamentalist on such a committee.«
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to help the site properly. Others give us insight into how the site is used and help us to optimize the user experience. See our privacy policy.