Find number abc
[7680] Find number abc - If 762ba - 61206 = 1502c find number abc. Multiple solutions may exist. - #brainteasers #math - Correct Answers: 1
BRAIN TEASERS
enter your answer and press button OK

Find number abc

If 762ba - 61206 = 1502c find number abc. Multiple solutions may exist.
Correct answers: 1
#brainteasers #math
Register with your Google Account and start collecting points.
Check your ranking on list.

A young boy walks into a barbe...

A young boy walks into a barber shop, and the barber leans in and says to his customer, "This is the dumbest kid in the world. Watch and see."

The barber then places a dollar bill in one hand and two quarters in the other, calling the boy over and asking, "Which one do you want, kid?"

The boy takes the quarters and leaves.

"See what I mean?" the barber says. "He never learns!"

Later, as the customer is leaving, he notices the same boy coming out of an ice cream parlor. "Hey, kid! Can I ask you something? Why did you pick the quarters over the dollar bill?"

The boy, enjoying his ice cream, replies, "Because if I took the dollar, the game would be over!"

Jokes of the day - Daily updated jokes. New jokes every day.
Follow Brain Teasers on social networks

Brain Teasers

puzzles, riddles, mathematical problems, mastermind, cinemania...

Windsurfer Patent

In 1968, a patent application was filed for a “Wind-Propelled Apparatus” by Jim Drake and Hoyle Schweitzer. When issued as No. 3,487,800 on 6 Jan 1970, it was the first U.S. patent for the Windsurfer sailboard: a surf-board with a sail on a mast articulated by a universal joint to the board. The rider can thus hold the boom and adjust the angle of the sail to control acceleration, turning and tacking, without need of a rudder or steering mechanism. The rider uses skill to moderate the propulsive power of the wind by manipulating the sail while keeping balanced on the craft. Drake was an aeronautical designer, and Schweitzer was a businessman and surfing enthusiast. Their British patent GB 1258317 was later revoked due to evidence in court of similar prior art presented by earlier innovators who did not patent.«
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to help the site properly. Others give us insight into how the site is used and help us to optimize the user experience. See our privacy policy.