Calculate the number 436
[903] Calculate the number 436 - NUMBERMANIA: Calculate the number 436 using numbers [3, 6, 2, 5, 84, 985] and basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /). Each of the numbers can be used only once. - #brainteasers #math #numbermania - Correct Answers: 38 - The first user who solved this task is Sanja Šabović
BRAIN TEASERS
enter your answer and press button OK

Calculate the number 436

NUMBERMANIA: Calculate the number 436 using numbers [3, 6, 2, 5, 84, 985] and basic arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /). Each of the numbers can be used only once.
Correct answers: 38
The first user who solved this task is Sanja Šabović.
#brainteasers #math #numbermania
Register with your Google Account and start collecting points.
Check your ranking on list.

Ponderings Collection 09


Why call then hot water heaters if the water is already hot?
If you throw a cat out a car window does it become kitty litter?
If corn oil comes from corn, where does baby oil come from?
If there is no God, who pops up the next Kleenex in the box?
When a cow laughs does milk come up its nose?
Why do they put braille on the number pads of drive-through bank machines?
How did a fool and his money GET together?
If nothing sticks to Teflon, how do they stick Teflon on the pan?
How do they get a deer to cross at that yellow road sign?
If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them?
Jokes of the day - Daily updated jokes. New jokes every day.
Follow Brain Teasers on social networks

Brain Teasers

puzzles, riddles, mathematical problems, mastermind, cinemania...

Joel H. Hildebrand

Died 30 Apr 1983 at age 101 (born 16 Nov 1881). U.S. educator and chemist whose monograph Solubility (1924; later editions, Solubility of Non-Electrolytes) was the classic reference for almost a half century. The Hildebrand solubility parameter carries his name. Through his research on the chemistry of solutions, he helped to protect deep-sea divers from “bends.” He led the fight against a faculty “loyalty oath,” a non-Communist declaration, at University of California (1950). He had no sympathy with Communists, but he and other prominent members of the faculty felt that the oath, by being required of teachers alone, was discriminatory with regard to all university employees. Two years later, the California State Supreme Court decided unanimously in favour of the faculty.
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to help the site properly. Others give us insight into how the site is used and help us to optimize the user experience. See our privacy policy.