Find number abc
[7821] Find number abc - If 6cba7 - a8779 = bb6c8 find number abc. Multiple solutions may exist. - #brainteasers #math - Correct Answers: 1
BRAIN TEASERS
enter your answer and press button OK

Find number abc

If 6cba7 - a8779 = bb6c8 find number abc. Multiple solutions may exist.
Correct answers: 1
#brainteasers #math
Register with your Google Account and start collecting points.
Check your ranking on list.

Things to do @ Wal-Mart w...

Things to do @ Wal-Mart while the significant other is taking his/her sweet time:

1. Look right into the security camera, and use it as a mirror while you pick your nose.
2. Take up an entire aisle in Toys by setting up a full scale battlefield with G. I. Joe's vs. the X-Men.
3. Ask other customers if they have any Grey Poupon.
4. Switch the men's and women's signs on the doors of the restroom.
5. Dart around suspiciously while humming the theme from "Mission Impossible."
6. Set up a "Valet Parking" sign in front of the store.
7. Hide in the clothing racks and when people browse through, say things like "pick me! pick me!!"
8. If the store has a food court, buy a soft drink; explain that you don't get out much, and ask if they can put a little umbrella in it.
Jokes of the day - Daily updated jokes. New jokes every day.
Follow Brain Teasers on social networks

Brain Teasers

puzzles, riddles, mathematical problems, mastermind, cinemania...

Kennewick Man skull discovery

In 1996, the skull of prehistoric Kennewick Man was found beside the Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington. Further archaeological digging uncovered bones of an almost complete skeleton, about 9,000 years old. As one of the very few specimens available to understand the peopling of America in that era, it offered great value to science. However, the land on which it was found was under the supervision of the U.S. Corps of Engineers which planned to repatriate the relics when local Indian tribes laid claim to them as being remains of an ancestor. Eight scientists sued to have access to the bones for research. The court found in their favour, saying the prehistoric age of the remains did not meet the legal definition covered by the Act which governs the return of more modern Indian remains.«
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to help the site properly. Others give us insight into how the site is used and help us to optimize the user experience. See our privacy policy.